↓ Skip to main content

Baby or bathwater? Referrals of “non-cases” in a targeted early identification intervention for psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Baby or bathwater? Referrals of “non-cases” in a targeted early identification intervention for psychosis
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00127-018-1502-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerald Jordan, Miriam Kinkaid, Srividya N. Iyer, Ridha Joober, Karen Goldberg, Ashok Malla, Jai L. Shah

Abstract

To explore the unintended impact of a targeted case identification (TCI) campaign for first episode psychosis (FEP) on people not experiencing FEP ("non-cases") with respect to referral patterns and reasons for being a non-case. Sources of referral, reasons for being a non-case, and subsequent referral destinations of non-cases were examined before and after a TCI. Following the TCI, a greater proportion of non-cases lived outside the study catchment area. A smaller proportion was referred by the parent hospital's emergency room or had a substance-induced psychosis. TCIs for FEP may have unintended effects, with implications for early case identification and early intervention services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Psychology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,752,468
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#692
of 2,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,778
of 335,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.