| Title |
New blood for old? High quality evidence that fresh red blood cells confer no benefit for critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5106-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy S. Walsh, Nicole P. Juffermans |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 78% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,494,712
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,042
of 5,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,366
of 333,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#82
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.