↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 246

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 12: A Nondestructive Method to Identify POP Contamination Sources in Omnivorous Seabirds
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Nondestructive Method to Identify POP Contamination Sources in Omnivorous Seabirds
Chapter number 12
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 246
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/398_2018_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-997739-3, 978-3-31-997740-9
Authors

Rosanne J. Michielsen, Judy Shamoun-Baranes, John R. Parsons, Michiel H.S. Kraak, Michielsen, Rosanne J., Shamoun-Baranes, Judy, Parsons, John R., Kraak, Michiel H.S.

Abstract

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are present in almost all environments due to their high bioaccumulation potential. Especially species that adapted to human activities, like gulls, might be exposed to harmful concentrations of these chemicals. The nature and degree of the exposure to POPs greatly vary between individual gulls, due to their diverse foraging behavior and specialization in certain foraging tactics. Therefore, in order clarify the effect of POP-contaminated areas on gull populations, it is important to identify the sources of POP contamination in individual gulls. Conventional sampling methods applied when studying POP contamination are destructive and ethically undesired. The aim of this literature review was to evaluate the potential of using feathers as a nondestructive method to determine sources of POP contamination in individual gulls. The reviewed data showed that high concentrations of PCBs and PBDEs in feathers together with a large proportion of less bioaccumulative congeners may indicate that the contamination originates from landfills. Low PCB and PBDE concentrations in feathers and a large proportion of more bioaccumulative congeners could indicate that the contamination originates from marine prey. We propose a nondestructive approach to identify the source of contamination in individual gulls based on individual contamination levels and PCB and PBDE congener profiles in feathers. Despite some uncertainties that might be reduced by future research, we conclude that especially when integrated with other methods like GPS tracking and the analysis of stable isotopic signatures, identifying the source of POP contamination based on congener profiles in feathers could become a powerful nondestructive method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,280,482
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#106
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,119
of 449,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them