↓ Skip to main content

Genetics and Genomics of Social Behavior in a Chicken Model

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetics and Genomics of Social Behavior in a Chicken Model
Published in
Genetics, March 2018
DOI 10.1534/genetics.118.300810
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Johnsson, Rie Henriksen, Jesper Fogelholm, Andrey Höglund, Per Jensen, Dominic Wright

Abstract

The identification of genes affecting sociality can give insights into the maintenance and development of sociality and personality. In this study, we used the combination of an advanced intercross between wild and domestic chickens with a combined QTL and eQTL genetical genomics approach to identify genes for social reinstatement, a social and anxiety-related behavior. A total of 24 social reinstatement QTL were identified and overlaid with over 600 eQTL obtained from the same birds using hypothalamic tissue. Correlations between overlapping QTL and eQTL indicated 5 strong candidate genes, with the geneTTRAPbeing strongly significantly correlated with multiple aspects of social reinstatement behavior, as well as possessing a highly significant eQTL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#589,063
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Genetics
#109
of 7,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,668
of 350,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics
#4
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.