↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeny of the Southeast Asian endemic genus Neocinnamomum H. Liu (Lauraceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Phylogeny of the Southeast Asian endemic genus Neocinnamomum H. Liu (Lauraceae)
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00606-010-0359-1
Authors

Zhi-hua Wang, Jie Li, John G. Conran, Hsi-wen Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 12%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2012.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#146
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,338
of 101,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them