| Title |
Performance measurement, cognitive dissonance and coping strategies: exploring individual responses to NPM-inspired output control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Management Control, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00187-018-0265-1 |
| Authors |
Berend van der Kolk, Wesley Kaufmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 11% |
| United States | 6 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 66% |
| Scientists | 20 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 35% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#777,665
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Management Control
#1
of 43 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,589
of 352,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Management Control
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 42 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them