↓ Skip to main content

Why are the great motor and sensory tracts of the central nervous system crossed?

Overview of attention for article published in Dublin Journal of Medical Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Why are the great motor and sensory tracts of the central nervous system crossed?
Published in
Dublin Journal of Medical Science, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/bf02972358
Authors

A. Francis Dixon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Professor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,675,798
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Dublin Journal of Medical Science
#3
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,015
of 241,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dublin Journal of Medical Science
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.