↓ Skip to main content

Ectomycorrhizal fungi and their enzymes in soils: is there enough evidence for their role as facultative soil saprotrophs?

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
Ectomycorrhizal fungi and their enzymes in soils: is there enough evidence for their role as facultative soil saprotrophs?
Published in
Oecologia, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00442-009-1433-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Petr Baldrian

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Italy 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 169 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 24%
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 52%
Environmental Science 31 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 33 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2011.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,058
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,714
of 129,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.