↓ Skip to main content

Medicinal plants used by latino healers for women’s health conditions in New York City

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Botany, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Medicinal plants used by latino healers for women’s health conditions in New York City
Published in
Economic Botany, July 2000
DOI 10.1007/bf02864786
Authors

Michael J. Balick, Fredi Kronenberg, Andreana L. Ososki, Marian Reiff, Adriane Fugh-Berman, O’Connor Bonnie, Maria Roble, Patricia Lohr, Daniel Atha

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
India 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Puerto Rico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 34%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Environmental Science 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#273
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,392
of 38,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.