↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 676)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10926-018-9756-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Lindsay, Elaine Cagliostro, Mikhaela Albarico, Neda Mortaji, Leora Karon

Abstract

Purpose We reviewed literature on the benefits of hiring people with disabilities. Increasing attention is being paid to the role of people with disabilities in the workplace. Although most research focuses on employers' concerns, many companies are now beginning to share their successes. However, there is no synthesis of the peer-reviewed literature on the benefits of hiring people with disabilities. Methods Our team conducted a systematic review, completing comprehensive searches of seven databases from 1997 to May 2017. We selected articles for inclusion that were peer-reviewed publications, had a sample involving people with disabilities, conducted an empirical study with at least one outcome focusing on the benefits of hiring people with disabilities, and focused on competitive employment. Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and rated the study quality. Results Of the 6176 studies identified in our search, 39 articles met our inclusion criteria. Findings show that benefits of hiring people with disabilities included improvements in profitability (e.g., profits and cost-effectiveness, turnover and retention, reliability and punctuality, employee loyalty, company image), competitive advantage (e.g., diverse customers, customer loyalty and satisfaction, innovation, productivity, work ethic, safety), inclusive work culture, and ability awareness. Secondary benefits for people with disabilities included improved quality of life and income, enhanced self-confidence, expanded social network, and a sense of community. Conclusions There are several benefits to hiring people with disabilities. Further research is needed to explore how benefits may vary by type of disability, industry, and job type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 413 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 10%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Researcher 28 7%
Other 72 17%
Unknown 154 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 55 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 48 12%
Psychology 38 9%
Unspecified 17 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 4%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 171 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#201,192
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#3
of 676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,616
of 451,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them