↓ Skip to main content

Quality of life among children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1: a systematic review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Quality of life among children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis 1: a systematic review of the literature
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11060-015-1725-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana-Maria Vranceanu, Vanessa L. Merker, Elyse R. Park, Scott R. Plotkin

Abstract

The aim of this research is to identify, within a systematic review, aspects of quality of life (QoL) that are adversely affected in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis (NF), and to report predictors of quality of life in this population. Published reports of original research were included if they described QoL in children and/or adolescents with NF, and met methodological quality according to a list of predefined criteria. Seven studies conducted between 2006 and 2013 met inclusion criteria. All seven studies examined patients with NF1 and reported that these patients have lower general QoL compared to population norms. Parents' proxy ratings of QoL were generally lower than children's self-report ratings. By parent proxy, familial NF1 was a strong protective factor for QoL, while the opposite was found by child report. By parent proxy, male sex was significantly associated with lower scores on the parental time impact of QoL. Skin-related QoL was only slightly altered in this population, and vision-specific QoL was impacted only in patients with bilateral blindness. The majority of findings regarding predictors of QoL in children with NF1 were weak, due to a lack of studies, heterogeneity of samples, and heterogeneity of measurements/predictors assessed. Future studies should examine more comprehensively the psychosocial factors affecting the NF population, especially in young patients with NF2 and schwannomatosis, who have been neglected in prior research. The use of consistent QoL measures is preferred to allow better comparison among studies and conditions. Interventions, including comprehensive mind-body treatments, are warranted to address impaired QoL in children and adolescents with NF1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 18%
Psychology 16 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 30 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,745,035
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,116
of 2,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,439
of 352,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#24
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,966 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.