↓ Skip to main content

Good judgments do not require complex cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Processing, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 359)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Good judgments do not require complex cognition
Published in
Cognitive Processing, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10339-009-0337-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian N. Marewski, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Gerd Gigerenzer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Germany 8 2%
Canada 4 1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 322 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 21%
Researcher 64 18%
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Professor 27 7%
Other 75 21%
Unknown 35 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 117 32%
Social Sciences 37 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 31 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 7%
Computer Science 25 7%
Other 76 21%
Unknown 50 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,615,164
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Processing
#24
of 359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,674
of 111,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Processing
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.