↓ Skip to main content

Tai Chi for older adults with chronic multisite pain: a randomized controlled pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Tai Chi for older adults with chronic multisite pain: a randomized controlled pilot study
Published in
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40520-018-0922-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tongjian You, Elisa F. Ogawa, Saurja Thapa, Yurun Cai, Huan Zhang, Satoshi Nagae, Gloria Y. Yeh, Peter M. Wayne, Ling Shi, Suzanne G. Leveille

Abstract

Chronic pain is associated with poorer cognition and mobility, and fall risk in older adults. To investigate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial of mind-body exercise (Tai Chi) versus a light physical exercise in older adults with multisite pain. Adults aged ≥ 65 years with multisite pain who reported falling in the past year or current use of an assistive device were recruited from Boston area communities. Participants were randomized to either a Tai Chi or a light physical exercise program, offered twice weekly for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included pain characteristics, cognition, physical function, gait mobility, fear of falling, and fall rate. Of 176 adults screened, 85 were eligible, and 54 consented and were enrolled (average age 75 ± 8 years; 96.30% white; 75.93% female). The dropout rate was 18% for Tai Chi and 12% for light physical exercise. For those completing the study, exercise class attendance rate was 76% for Tai Chi and 82% for light physical exercise. There were no significant group differences in most secondary outcomes. Tai Chi significantly lowered pain severity (4.58 ± 1.73-3.73 ± 1.79, p < 0.01) and pain interference (4.20 ± 2.53 to 3.16 ± 2.28, p < 0.05), reduced fear of falling (90.82 ± 9.59 to 96.84 ± 10.67, p < 0.05), and improved several single-task and dual-task gait variables, while light physical exercise did not change these measures. This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a larger randomized controlled trial in older adults with multisite pain. Study findings and challenges encountered will inform future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Researcher 10 4%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 97 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Sports and Recreations 22 9%
Psychology 11 5%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 102 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,705,892
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#301
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,760
of 347,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.