You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Instream Habitat Restoration and Stream Temperature Reduction in a Whirling Disease‐Positive Spring Creek in the Blackfoot River Basin, Montana
|
---|---|
Published in |
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1080/00028487.2014.925972 |
Authors |
Ron Pierce, Craig Podner, Laurie Marczak, Leslie Jones |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 10 | 25% |
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 15 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 23% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,171,144
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
#132
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,270
of 228,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.