You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Enhanced removal of Zn2+ or Cd2+ by the flocculating Chlorella vulgaris JSC-7
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Hazardous Materials, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Asraful Alam, Chun Wan, Xin-Qing Zhao, Li-Jie Chen, Jo-Shu Chang, Feng-Wu Bai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#1,726
of 7,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,078
of 361,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Hazardous Materials
#10
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.