| Title |
Efficient management for the Hokkaido population of sika deer Cervus nippon in Japan: accounting for migration and management cost
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Population Ecology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10144-015-0478-1 |
| Authors |
Hirotaka Ijima, Aomi Fujimaki, Umika Ohta, Kohji Yamamura, Hiroyuki Yokomizo, Hiroyuki Uno, Hiroyuki Matsuda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 50% |
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 13% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,489,290
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Population Ecology
#267
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,092
of 364,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Ecology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.