↓ Skip to main content

Artificial language philosophy of science

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal for Philosophy of Science, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Artificial language philosophy of science
Published in
European Journal for Philosophy of Science, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13194-011-0042-6
Authors

Sebastian Lutz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 6 38%
Social Sciences 4 25%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,075,933
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#140
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,486
of 243,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal for Philosophy of Science
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.