↓ Skip to main content

Presence of bark influences the succession of cryptogamic wood-inhabiting communities on conifer fallen logs

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Geobotanica, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Presence of bark influences the succession of cryptogamic wood-inhabiting communities on conifer fallen logs
Published in
Folia Geobotanica, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12224-018-9310-y
Authors

Helena Kushnevskaya, Ekaterina Shorohova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 33%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 33%
Environmental Science 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,590,133
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Folia Geobotanica
#167
of 243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,332
of 333,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Geobotanica
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 243 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.