↓ Skip to main content

Technical note: A simple approach for efficient collection of field reference data for calibrating remote sensing mapping of northern wetlands

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeosciences, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technical note: A simple approach for efficient collection of field reference data for calibrating remote sensing mapping of northern wetlands
Published in
Biogeosciences, March 2018
DOI 10.5194/bg-15-1549-2018
Authors

Magnus Gålfalk, Martin Karlson, Patrick Crill, Philippe Bousquet, David Bastviken

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 26%
Other 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biogeosciences
#2,001
of 3,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,473
of 351,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeosciences
#62
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.