↓ Skip to main content

Open lung biopsy in nonresolving ARDS frequently identifies diffuse alveolar damage regardless of the severity stage and may have implications for patient management

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Open lung biopsy in nonresolving ARDS frequently identifies diffuse alveolar damage regardless of the severity stage and may have implications for patient management
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00134-014-3583-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claude Guerin, Frédérique Bayle, Véronique Leray, Sophie Debord, Alina Stoian, Hodane Yonis, Jean-Baptiste Roudaut, Gael Bourdin, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Elodie Bucher, Louis Ayzac, Sylvie Lantuejoul, Carole Philipponnet, Jean Louis Kemeny, Bertrand Souweine, Jean-Christophe Richard

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the rate of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) on open lung biopsy (OLB) performed in the ICU for nonresolving ARDS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 82 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Professor 7 8%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,425,416
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,695
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,422
of 359,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#36
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.