| Title |
Impact of the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (DLAR) on therapeutic options to reduce increased Lp(a) levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11789-015-0073-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Volker J. J. Schettler, Class L. Neumann, Christian Peter, Thomas Zimmermann, Ulrich Julius, Eberhard Roeseler, Franz Heigl, The German Apheresis Working Group |
| Abstract |
The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (DLAR) has been initiated by members of the Nephrology Foundation (WiNe), the German association of kidney centres (DN), the German society of nephrology (DGfN) and additional medical associations taking part in the apheresis working group. Its goal is the introduction of a substantial database, suitable to provide statistical evidence for the assessment of extracorporeal procedures. Data have been added to the DLAR since October 2011. In this article, preliminary results are first reported. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,848,153
of 25,137,221 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements
#8
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,678
of 364,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,137,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one scored the same or higher as 11 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.