Title |
Holmes and Horrax (1919) revisited: Impaired binocular fusion as a cause of “flat vision” after right parietal brain damage – A case study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuropsychologia, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.029 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anna-Katharina Schaadt, Stephan A. Brandt, Antje Kraft, Georg Kerkhoff |
Abstract |
The complete loss of binocular depth perception ("flat vision") was first thoroughly described by Holmes and Horrax (1919), and has been occasionally reported thereafter in patients with bilateral posterior-parietal lesions. Though partial spontaneous recovery occurred in some cases, the precise cause(s) of this condition remained obscure for almost a century. Here, we describe a unique patient (EH) with a large right-sided occipito-parietal hemorrhage showing a complete loss of visual depth perception for several months post-stroke. EH could well simultaneously describe multiple visual objects - hence did not show simultanagnosia - but at the same time was completely unable to estimate their distance from him. In every 3-D visual scene objects appeared equidistant to him, thus experiencing a total loss of depth perception ("flat vision"). Neurovisual assessments revealed normal functions of the eyes. EH showed bilateral lower field loss and a severely impaired binocular convergent fusion, but preserved stereopsis. Perceptual re-training of binocular fusion resulted in a progressive and finally complete recovery of objective binocular fusion values and subjective binocular depth perception in a far-to-near-space, gradient-like manner. In parallel, visual depth estimation of relative distances improved, whereas stereopsis remained unchanged. Our results show that a complete loss of 3-D depth perception can result from an isolated impairment in binocular fusion. On a neuroanatomical level, this connection could be explained by a selective lesion of area V6/V6A in the medial occipito-parietal cortex that has been associated with the integration of visual space coordinates and sustained eye-positions into a cyclopean visual 3-D percept. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 14 | 27% |
Psychology | 9 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |