↓ Skip to main content

Microbiome dynamics during ensiling of corn with and without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Microbiome dynamics during ensiling of corn with and without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00253-018-8903-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jitendra Keshri, Yaira Chen, Riky Pinto, Yulia Kroupitski, Zwi G. Weinberg, Shlomo Sela (Saldinger)

Abstract

Microbial population dynamics associated with corn silage, with and without Lactobacillus plantarum treatment, was studied. Whole crop corn was ensiled using laboratory silos and sampled at different times, up to 3 months. The dominant bacteria, before ensiling, were Acinetobacter (38.5%) and Klebsiella (16.3%), while the dominant fungi were Meyerozyma (53.5%) and Candida (27.7%). During ensiling, the microbial population shifted considerably, and Lactobacillus (> 94%) and Candida (> 74%) became the most dominant microbial genera in both treated and untreated silages. Yet, lactic acid content was higher in the treated silage, while the microbial diversity was lower than in the untreated silage. Upon aerobic exposure, spoilage occurred more rapidly in the treated silage, possibly due to the higher abundance of lactic acid-assimilating fungi, such as Candida. Our study is the first to describe microbial population dynamics during whole-crop corn ensiling and the results indicate that microbial diversity may be an indicator of aerobic stability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,242,425
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#999
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,100
of 337,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#22
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.