| Title |
Ten false beliefs in neurocritical care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5131-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geert Meyfroidt, David Menon, Alexis F. Turgeon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 365 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 51 | 14% |
| United States | 31 | 8% |
| Spain | 22 | 6% |
| Mexico | 16 | 4% |
| Canada | 10 | 3% |
| Colombia | 10 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 9 | 2% |
| France | 8 | 2% |
| Italy | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 17% |
| Unknown | 139 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 272 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 59 | 16% |
| Scientists | 24 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 27% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 58% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#164,261
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#115
of 5,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,849
of 353,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.