↓ Skip to main content

Validity of Childhood Autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register: Findings from a Cohort Sample Born 1990–1999

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Validity of Childhood Autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register: Findings from a Cohort Sample Born 1990–1999
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0818-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marlene B. Lauritsen, Meta Jørgensen, Kreesten M. Madsen, Sanne Lemcke, Susanne Toft, Jakob Grove, Diana E. Schendel, Poul Thorsen

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of the diagnosis of childhood autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register (DPCR) by reviewing medical records from 499 of 504 total children with childhood autism born 1990-1999. Based on review of abstracted behaviors recorded in case records from child psychiatric hospitals, case status determination was performed using a standardized coding scheme. In 499 children diagnosed with childhood autism in the DPCR, the diagnosis could be confirmed in 469 children (94%). Of the 30 non-confirmed cases, five were classified by the reviewers as non-autistic cases and the remaining 25 cases were either classified with another ASD diagnosis or the specific diagnosis was not possible to determine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 22 23%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Psychology 18 19%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,973,904
of 24,916,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#843
of 5,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,938
of 97,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,916,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.