↓ Skip to main content

Yoga and immune system functioning: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 1,157)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Yoga and immune system functioning: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10865-018-9914-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. I. Falkenberg, C. Eising, M. L. Peters

Abstract

Yoga is an ancient mind-body practice that is increasingly recognized to have health benefits in a variety of clinical and non-clinical conditions. This systematic review summarizes the findings of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of yoga on immune system functioning which is imperative to justify its application in the clinic. Fifteen RCTs were eligible for the review. Even though the existing evidence is not entirely consistent, a general pattern emerged suggesting that yoga can downregulate pro-inflammatory markers. In particular, the qualitative evaluation of RCTs revealed decreases in IL-1beta, as well as indications for reductions in IL-6 and TNF-alpha. These results imply that yoga may be implemented as a complementary intervention for populations at risk or already suffering from diseases with an inflammatory component. Beyond this, yoga practice may exert further beneficial effects by enhancing cell-mediated and mucosal immunity. It is hypothesized that longer time spans of yoga practice are required to achieve consistent effects especially on circulating inflammatory markers. Overall, this field of investigation is still young, hence the current body of evidence is small and for most immune parameters, more research is required to draw distinct conclusions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 74 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Psychology 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 79 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#196,309
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#21
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,650
of 455,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them