| Title |
Exploring key issues of aerobic scope interpretation in ectotherms: absolute versus factorial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-018-9516-3 |
| Authors |
Lewis G. Halsey, Shaun S. Killen, Timothy D. Clark, Tommy Norin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 31% |
| Australia | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 3 | 12% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,123,500
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#110
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,812
of 337,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them