Title |
Influence of striking technique on maximum striking velocities—experimental and statistical investigation
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Legal Medicine, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00414-018-1825-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Holger Muggenthaler, T. X. Trinh, S. Heinke, C. Rode, S. Schenkl, M. Hubig, G. Mall |
Abstract |
Forensic experts often have to assess injury and fatality risks in the context of violent blunt force trauma. Maximum striking velocities in one- and two-handed strikes with a rod-like implement can be of particular interest. Current literature lacks studies addressing this problem. The purpose of this study was therefore to measure and analyse maximum striking velocities in one-handed and two-handed strikes in female and male volunteers. We hypothesised higher striking velocities in two-handed strikes compared to one-handed strikes. Fifty volunteers performed one- and two-handed strikes from top to bottom using a steel rod of 65 cm length and 1000 g weight. A Qualisys™ Motion Analysis system registered displacements of reflecting markers fixed to the rod as well as to the volunteer's body. In one-handed strikes, the mean maximum striking velocity was 17.2 m/s in the female sample and 23.9 m/s in the male sample. Statistically not significantly different maximum striking velocities were found in two-handed strikes with mean values of 18.3 m/s in the female sample and 24.2 m/s in the male sample. Female and male volunteers also yielded similar mean maximum striking velocities in two-handed strikes comparing 'overhead' and 'overshoulder' striking techniques. In conclusion, the striking technique did not relevantly influence maximum striking velocities in our setup. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 23% |
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 3 | 23% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |