↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10151-018-1770-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Kuismanen, K. Nieminen, K. Karjalainen, K. Lehto, J. Uotila

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the subjective outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) at 6 months, the factors associated with the symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the role of a simple survey consisting in one question with three answer choices, combined with the Wexner incontinence score for the assessment of this patient population. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with third- or fourth-degree OASIS operated on between January 2007 and December 2013 inclusive at Tampere University Hospital, Finland. At 6 months, the patients were asked to report their Wexner's score as well as the three-choice assessment regarding AI symptoms. Based on this assessment, the patients were divided into three groups: those, asymptomatic, those with mild symptoms who did not want further treatment and those with severe symptoms who were willing to undergo further evaluation and treatment. There were 325 patients (median age 30 years). A total of 310 patients answered the questionnaire. Of which, one hundred and ninety-eight (63.9%) patients were asymptomatic, 85 (27.4%) had mild AI, and 27 (8.7%) experienced severe symptoms. There was no statistical difference in the results between the two techniques used (overlapping vs. end-to-end), or the stage of specialization of the operating physician. Persistent symptoms were associated with instrumental vaginal delivery (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32-3.41), severity of the injury (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.25), and increased maternal age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13). The correlation between the three-choice symptom evaluation and the Wexner score was good (Spearman's rho 0.82). After 6 months, severe symptoms after OASIS repair were present in 9% of women and were more frequent in older women, women with high-degree tears and after instrumental vaginal delivery. A three-choice assessment of AI symptoms correlated well with the Wexner score and might be useful to triage patients who need further evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 16 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Linguistics 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 19 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,094,948
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#908
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,089
of 333,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.