↓ Skip to main content

Relationship of Phenotype and Genotype in X-Linked Amelogenesis Imperfecta

Overview of attention for article published in Connective Tissue Research, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship of Phenotype and Genotype in X-Linked Amelogenesis Imperfecta
Published in
Connective Tissue Research, August 2009
DOI 10.1080/03008200390152124
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. T. Wright, P. S. Hart, M. J. Aldred, K. Seow, P. J. M. Crawford, S. P. Hong, C. W. Gibson, T. C. Hart

Abstract

X-linked amelogenesis imperfectas (AI) resulting from mutations in the amelogenin gene (AMELX) are phenotypically and genetically diverse. Amelogenin is the predominant matrix protein in developing enamel and is essential for normal enamel formation. To date, 12 allelic AMELX mutations have been described that purportedly result in markedly different expressed amelogenin protein products. We hypothesize that these AMELX gene mutations result in unique and functionally altered amelogenin proteins that are associated with distinct amelogenesis imperfecta phenotypes. The AMELX mutations and associated phenotypes fall generally into three categories. (1) Mutations (e.g., signal peptide mutations) causing a total of loss of amelogenin protein are associated with a primarily hypoplastic phenotype (though mineralization defects also can occur). (2) Missense mutations affecting the N-terminal region, especially those causing changes in the putative lectin-binding domain and TRAP (tyrosine rich amelogenin protein) region of the amelogenin molecule, result in a predominantly hypomineralization/hypomaturation AI phenotype with enamel that is discolored and has retained amelogenin. (3) Mutations causing loss of the amelogenin C terminus result in a phenotype characterized by hypoplasia. The consistent association of similar hypoplastic or hypomineralization/hypomaturation AI phenotypes with specific AMELX mutations may help identify distinct functional domains of the amelogenin molecule. The phenotype-genotype correlations in this study suggest there are important functional domains of the amelogenin molecule that are critical for the development of normal enamel structure, composition, and thickness.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Connective Tissue Research
#126
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,191
of 110,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Connective Tissue Research
#50
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.