| Title |
Noninvasive imaging of tumor hypoxia in rats using the 2-nitroimidazole 18F-EF5
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, November 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00259-002-1037-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Ziemer, S. Evans, A. Kachur, A. Shuman, C. Cardi, W. Jenkins, J. Karp, A. Alavi, W. Dolbier, C. Koch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#427
of 3,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,251
of 135,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.