↓ Skip to main content

Continuous remission of newly diagnosed and relapsed central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Continuous remission of newly diagnosed and relapsed central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11060-004-3115-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Ann Zimmerman, Liliana C. Goumnerova, Mark Proctor, R. Michael Scott, Karen Marcus, Scott L. Pomeroy, Christopher D. Turner, Susan N. Chi, Christine Chordas, Mark W. Kieran

Abstract

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) are highly malignant lesions of childhood that carry a very poor prognosis. AT/RT can occur in the central nervous system (CNS AT/RT) and disease in this location carries an even worse prognosis with a median survival of 7 months. In spite of multiple treatment regimens consisting of maximal surgical resection (including second look surgery), radiation therapy (focal and craniospinal), and multi-agent intravenous, oral and intrathecal chemotherapy, with or without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue, only seven long-term survivors of CNS AT/RT have been reported, all in patients with newly diagnosed disease. For this reason, many centers now direct such patients, particularly those under 5 years of age, or those with recurrent disease, towards comfort care rather than attempt curative therapy. We now report on four children, two with newly diagnosed CNS AT/RT and two with progressive disease after multi-agent chemotherapy who are long term survivors (median follow-up of 37 months) using a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and intensive chemotherapy. The chemotherapy component was modified from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRS III) parameningeal protocol as three of the seven reported survivors in the literature were treated using this type of therapy. Our four patients, when added to the three reported survivors in the literature using this approach, suggest that patients provided this aggressive therapy can significantly alter the course of their disease. More importantly, we report on the first two survivors after relapse with multi-agent intravenous and intrathecal chemotherapy treated with this modified regimen.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 15 29%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 62%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2008.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,041
of 2,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,784
of 59,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,966 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.