↓ Skip to main content

Neural pathways involved in infection-induced inflammation: recent insights and clinical implications

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Autonomic Research, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Neural pathways involved in infection-induced inflammation: recent insights and clinical implications
Published in
Clinical Autonomic Research, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10286-018-0518-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marion Griton, Jan Pieter Konsman

Abstract

Although the immune and nervous systems have long been considered independent biological systems, they turn out to mingle and interact extensively. The present review summarizes recent insights into the neural pathways activated by and involved in infection-induced inflammation and discusses potential clinical applications. The simplest activation concerns a reflex action within C-fibers leading to neurogenic inflammation. Low concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines or bacterial fragments may also act on these afferent nerve fibers to signal the central nervous system and bring about early fever, hyperalgesia and sickness behavior. In the brain, the preoptic area and the paraventricular hypothalamus are part of a neuronal network mediating sympathetic activation underlying fever while brainstem circuits play a role in the reduction of food intake after systemic exposure to bacterial fragments. A vagally-mediated anti-inflammatory reflex mechanism has been proposed and, in turn, questioned because the major immune organs driving inflammation, such as the spleen, are not innervated by vagal efferent fibers. On the contrary, sympathetic nerves do innervate these organs and modulate immune cell responses, production of inflammatory mediators and bacterial dissemination. Noradrenaline, which is both released by these fibers and often administered during sepsis, along with adrenaline, may exert pro-inflammatory actions through the stimulation of β1 adrenergic receptors, as antagonists of this receptor have been shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects in experimental sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 24 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,072,573
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Autonomic Research
#397
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,721
of 335,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Autonomic Research
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.