↓ Skip to main content

Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Individuals from Racial and Ethnic Groups and Rural Communities—A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Disparities in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Individuals from Racial and Ethnic Groups and Rural Communities—A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40615-018-0478-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis R. Castellanos, Omar Viramontes, Nainjot K. Bains, Ignacio A. Zepeda

Abstract

Despite the well-described benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on long-term health outcomes, CR is a resource that is underutilized by a significant proportion of patients that suffer from cardiovascular diseases. The main purpose of this study was to examine disparities in CR referral and participation rates among individuals from rural communities and racial and ethnic minority groups with coronary heart disease (CHD) when compared to the general population. A systematic search of standard databases including MedlLine, PubMed, and Cochrane databases was conducted using keywords that included cardiac rehabilitation, women, race and ethnicity, disparities, and rural populations. Twenty-eight clinical studies from 1990 to 2017 were selected and included 478,955 patients with CHD. The majority of available clinical studies showed significantly lower CR referral and participation rates among individuals from rural communities, women, and racial and ethnic groups when compared to the general population. Similar to geographic region, socioeconomic status (SES) appears to directly impact the use of CR programs. Patients of lower SES have significantly lower CR referral and participation rates than patients of higher SES. Data presented underscores the need for systematic referrals using electronic health records for patients with CHD in order to increase overall CR referral and participation rates of minority populations and other vulnerable groups. Educational programs that target healthcare provider biases towards racial and ethnic groups may help attenuate observed disparities. Alternative modalities such as home-based and internet-based CR programs may also help improve CR participation rates among vulnerable populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 29 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Psychology 7 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 30 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#624,559
of 25,468,708 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#58
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,451
of 352,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,468,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.