↓ Skip to main content

Optimal control of dosage decisions in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Operations Research, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Optimal control of dosage decisions in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation
Published in
Annals of Operations Research, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10479-009-0563-y
Authors

Miao He, Lei Zhao, Warren B. Powell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 33 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 8 22%
Computer Science 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Engineering 2 6%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Operations Research
#111
of 724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,739
of 97,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Operations Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 724 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them