↓ Skip to main content

The direct conversion of wood charcoal to lithium carbide in the production of acetylene for radiocarbon dating

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 1964
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
The direct conversion of wood charcoal to lithium carbide in the production of acetylene for radiocarbon dating
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 1964
DOI 10.1007/bf02146038
Authors

E. R. Swart

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,146
of 5,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#808
of 9,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them