↓ Skip to main content

Two poset polytopes

Overview of attention for article published in Discrete & Computational Geometry, March 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
238 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Two poset polytopes
Published in
Discrete & Computational Geometry, March 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02187680
Authors

Richard P. Stanley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Researcher 4 20%
Professor 3 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 10 50%
Computer Science 4 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#111
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,883
of 10,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them