↓ Skip to main content

Methods for Fabrication of Nanoscale Topography for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
19 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
329 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
Title
Methods for Fabrication of Nanoscale Topography for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10439-005-9005-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

James J. Norman, Tejal A. Desai

Abstract

Observations of how controlling the microenvironment of cell cultures can lead to changes in a variety of parameters has lead investigators to begin studying how the nano-environment of a culture can affects cells. Cells have many structures at the nanoscale such as filipodia and cytoskeletal and membrane proteins that interact with the environment surrounding them. By using techniques that can control the nano-environment presented to a cell, investigators are beginning to be able to mimic the nanoscale topographical features presented to cells by extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen, which has precise and repeating nano-topography. The belief is that these nanoscale surface features are important to creating more natural cell growth and function. A number of techniques are currently being used to create nanoscale topographies for cell scaffolding. These techniques fall into two main categories: techniques that create ordered topographies and those that create unordered topographies. Electron Beam lithography and photo-lithography are two standard techniques for creating ordered features. Polymer demixing, phase separation, colloidal lithography and chemical etching are most typically used for creating unordered surface patterns. This review will give an overview of these techniques and cite observations from experiments carried out using them.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 260 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 27%
Student > Master 46 16%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 36 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 77 28%
Materials Science 43 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 14%
Chemistry 18 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 5%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 48 17%