↓ Skip to main content

A bioinformatics based approach to discover small RNA genes in the Escherichia coli genome

Overview of attention for article published in Biosystems, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
16 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A bioinformatics based approach to discover small RNA genes in the Escherichia coli genome
Published in
Biosystems, March 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0303-2647(02)00013-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuo Chen, Elena A. Lesnik, Thomas A. Hall, Rangarajan Sampath, Richard H. Griffey, Dave J. Ecker, Lawrence B. Blyn

Abstract

The recent explosion in available bacterial genome sequences has initiated the need to improve an ability to annotate important sequence and structural elements in a fast, efficient and accurate manner. In particular, small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) have been difficult to predict. The sRNAs play an important number of structural, catalytic and regulatory roles in the cell. Although a few groups have recently published prediction methods for annotating sRNAs in bacterial genome, much remains to be done in this field. Toward the goal of developing an efficient method for predicting unknown sRNA genes in the completed Escherichia coli genome, we adopted a bioinformatics approach to search for DNA regions that contain a sigma70 promoter within a short distance of a rho-independent terminator. Among a total of 227 candidate sRNA genes initially identified, 32 were previously described sRNAs, orphan tRNAs, and partial tRNA and rRNA operons. Fifty-one are mRNAs genes encoding annotated extremely small open reading frames (ORFs) following an acceptable ribosome binding site. One hundred forty-four are potentially novel non-translatable sRNA genes. Using total RNA isolated from E. coli MG1655 cells grown under four different conditions, we verified transcripts of some of the genes by Northern hybridization. Here we summarize our data and discuss the rules and advantages/disadvantages of using this approach in annotating sRNA genes on bacterial genomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 153 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 27%
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Professor 11 7%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 17%
Computer Science 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 18 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2013.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biosystems
#155
of 1,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,664
of 49,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosystems
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them