↓ Skip to main content

Reconnecting with nature for sustainability

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 959)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
book_reviews
1 book reviewer
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
290 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
765 Mendeley
Title
Reconnecting with nature for sustainability
Published in
Sustainability Science, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0542-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher D. Ives, David J. Abson, Henrik von Wehrden, Christian Dorninger, Kathleen Klaniecki, Joern Fischer

Abstract

Calls for humanity to 'reconnect to nature' have grown increasingly louder from both scholars and civil society. Yet, there is relatively little coherence about what reconnecting to nature means, why it should happen and how it can be achieved. We present a conceptual framework to organise existing literature and direct future research on human-nature connections. Five types of connections to nature are identified: material, experiential, cognitive, emotional, and philosophical. These various types have been presented as causes, consequences, or treatments of social and environmental problems. From this conceptual base, we discuss how reconnecting people with nature can function as a treatment for the global environmental crisis. Adopting a social-ecological systems perspective, we draw upon the emerging concept of 'leverage points'-places in complex systems to intervene to generate change-and explore examples of how actions to reconnect people with nature can help transform society towards sustainability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 765 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 765 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 120 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 12%
Researcher 80 10%
Student > Bachelor 53 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 4%
Other 117 15%
Unknown 277 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 154 20%
Social Sciences 73 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 7%
Psychology 25 3%
Design 25 3%
Other 112 15%
Unknown 325 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#150,102
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#2
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,524
of 346,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.