↓ Skip to main content

A primary breast cancer with distinct foci of estrogen receptor-alpha positive and negative cells derived from the same clonal origin as revealed by whole exome sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
A primary breast cancer with distinct foci of estrogen receptor-alpha positive and negative cells derived from the same clonal origin as revealed by whole exome sequencing
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10549-018-4742-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Kyker-Snowman, Bracha Erlanger Avigdor, Mansoor Nasim, Ashley Cimino-Mathews, Sarah J. Wheelan, Pedram Argani, Ben Ho Park

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity is a now well-recognized phenomenon that can affect the classification, prognosis and treatment of human cancers. Heterogeneity is often described in primary breast cancers based upon histologic subtypes, hormone- and HER2-receptor status, and immunolabeling for various markers, which can be seen within a single tumor as mixed cellular populations, or as separate discrete foci. Here, we present a case report of a patient's primary breast cancer that had two separate but adjacent histologic components, one that was estrogen receptor (ER) positive, and the other ER negative. Each component was subjected to whole exome sequencing and compared for gene identity to determine clonal origin. Using prior bioinformatic tools, we demonstrated that both the ER positive and negative components shared many variants, including passenger and driver alterations. Copy number variations also supported the two components were derived from a single common clone. These analyses strongly suggest that the two ER components of this patient's breast cancer were derived from the same clonal origin. Our results have implications for the evolution of breast cancers with mixed histologies, and how they might be best managed for optimal therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Computer Science 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Engineering 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,116,294
of 24,938,276 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#2,996
of 4,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,749
of 339,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#33
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,938,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.