↓ Skip to main content

Transverse flap duodenoplasty (TFD): a new technique in autologous bowel reconstructive surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Surgery International, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Transverse flap duodenoplasty (TFD): a new technique in autologous bowel reconstructive surgery
Published in
Pediatric Surgery International, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00383-018-4245-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Alberti, Laura Righetti, Adrian Bianchi, Gian Luigi de’Angelis, Giovanni Boroni

Abstract

Bowel dilatation is a common adaptive mechanism after intestinal resection. The symptomatic dilated dysmotile duodenum is difficult to manage, since conventional bowel tailoring and lengthening techniques are potentially hazardous because of the anatomy of the duodenal blood supply, the proximity to the pancreas, and the risk of injury to the common bile duct. A 2-month-old child with short bowel and a symptomatic massively dilated duodenum was treated with a Transverse Flap Duodenoplasty (TFD). The duodenum was opened longitudinally along its antimesenteric border preserving an intact strip of tissue overlying the pancreatic head. Three full thickness vascularized pedicle flaps were cut on both the anterior and posterior walls and were spirally rotated and sutured to create a uniform propulsive duodenum without diverticulae. Healing was complicated by a soft anastomotic duodeno-ileal stenosis that resolved after three elective balloon dilatations. Oral feeding established rapidly. The child is growing, does not vomit, and passes 1-2 semiformed motions daily. TFD is a safe and versatile technique that preserves all duodenal absorptive mucosa and that removes any risk to the pancreas, bile duct, and ampulla of Vater. Our experience, although limited, has been encouraging and leads us to suggest TFD for the management of the difficult symptomatic dysmotile dilated duodenum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Professor 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Unspecified 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Unspecified 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 6 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,591,506
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Surgery International
#744
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,444
of 333,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Surgery International
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.