↓ Skip to main content

Role of zinc and copper ions in the pathogenetic mechanisms of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Biochemistry, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Role of zinc and copper ions in the pathogenetic mechanisms of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases
Published in
Biochemistry, May 2014
DOI 10.1134/s0006297914050022
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. V. Stelmashook, N. K. Isaev, E. E. Genrikhs, G. A. Amelkina, L. G. Khaspekov, V. G. Skrebitsky, S. N. Illarioshkin

Abstract

Disbalance of zinc (Zn2+) and copper (Cu2+) ions in the central nervous system is involved in the pathogenesis of numerous neurodegenerative disorders such as multisystem atrophy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Wilson-Konovalov disease, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. Among these, Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are the most frequent age-related neurodegenerative pathologies with disorders in Zn2+ and Cu2+ homeostasis playing a pivotal role in the mechanisms of pathogenesis. In this review we generalized and systematized current literature data concerning this problem. The interactions of Zn2+ and Cu2+ with amyloid precursor protein (APP), β-amyloid (Abeta), tau-protein, metallothioneins, and GSK3β are considered, as well as the role of these interactions in the generation of free radicals in AD and PD. Analysis of the literature suggests that the main factors of AD and PD pathogenesis (oxidative stress, structural disorders and aggregation of proteins, mitochondrial dysfunction, energy deficiency) that initiate a cascade of events resulting finally in the dysfunction of neuronal networks are mediated by the disbalance of Zn2+ and Cu2+.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Chemistry 15 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Neuroscience 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biochemistry
#21,449
of 22,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,317
of 241,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochemistry
#78
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.