↓ Skip to main content

Bone morphogenetic proteins and their antagonists

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bone morphogenetic proteins and their antagonists
Published in
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11154-006-9000-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabetta Gazzerro, Ernesto Canalis

Abstract

Skeletal homeostasis is determined by systemic hormones and local factors. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are unique because they induce the commitment of mesenchymal cells toward cells of the osteoblastic lineage and also enhance the differentiated function of the osteoblast. BMP activities in bone are mediated through binding to specific cell surface receptors and through interactions with other growth factors. BMPs are required for skeletal development and maintenance of adult bone homeostasis, and play a role in fracture healing. BMPs signal by activating the mothers against decapentaplegic (Smad) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, and their actions are tempered by intracellular and extracellular proteins. The BMP antagonists block BMP signal transduction at multiple levels including pseudoreceptor, inhibitory intracellular binding proteins, and factors that induce BMP ubiquitination. A large number of extracellular proteins that bind BMPs and prevent their binding to signaling receptors have emerged. The extracellular antagonists are differentially expressed in cartilage and bone tissue and exhibit BMP antagonistic as well as additional activities. Both intracellular and extracellular antagonists are regulated by BMPs, indicating the existence of local feedback mechanisms to modulate BMP cellular activities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 165 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 23%
Researcher 33 19%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 15%
Engineering 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 24 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#219
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,098
of 68,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.