↓ Skip to main content

Bucking the Trend: Is Ethnoracial Diversity Declining in American Communities?

Overview of attention for article published in Population Research and Policy Review, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 657)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Bucking the Trend: Is Ethnoracial Diversity Declining in American Communities?
Published in
Population Research and Policy Review, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11113-014-9343-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barrett A. Lee, Lauren A. Hughes

Abstract

Although increasing diversity at the national scale is a well-documented trend, substantial variation in patterns of ethnoracial change occurs across American communities. Our research considers one theoretically implied path: that some communities are 'bucking the trend', becoming more homogeneous over time. Using 1980 through 2010 decennial census data, we calculate panethnic (five-group) entropy index scores to measure the magnitude of diversity for nearly 11,000 census-defined places. Our results indicate that while certain places reach their diversity peak in 1980 or 1990, they are few in number. Moreover, they experience a variety of post-peak trajectories other than monotonic diversity decline. Decreasing diversity is concentrated in the South and West, among places with higher levels of diversity and larger proportions of Hispanic or black residents at the beginning of the study period. These places exhibit complex shifts in racial-ethnic structure, but Hispanic succession predominates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 39%
Professor 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 68%
Psychology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2017.
All research outputs
#631,673
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Population Research and Policy Review
#24
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,609
of 246,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Research and Policy Review
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them