↓ Skip to main content

Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina and nanosilver in fume hoods

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanoparticle Research, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina and nanosilver in fume hoods
Published in
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11051-008-9459-z
Authors

Su-Jung (Candace) Tsai, Earl Ada, Jacqueline A. Isaacs, Michael J. Ellenbecker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 81 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Other 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 18%
Chemistry 13 15%
Environmental Science 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,548,107
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#249
of 907 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,729
of 82,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 907 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.