| Title |
A review of split-bolus single-pass CT in the assessment of trauma patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emergency Radiology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10140-018-1591-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cassandra Jeavons, Craig Hacking, Ludo F. Beenen, Martin L. Gunn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,844,049
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Radiology
#195
of 588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,007
of 347,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Radiology
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 588 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.