| Title |
Correction to: Global dietary calcium intake among adults: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-018-4447-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. M. Balk, G. P. Adam, V. N. Langberg, A. Earley, P. Clark, P. R. Ebeling, A. Mithal, R. Rizzoli, C. A. F. Zerbini, D. D. Pierroz, B. Dawson-Hughes, for the International Osteoporosis Foundation Calcium Steering Committee |
| Abstract |
The original Electronic Supplementary Material file 3 contained an erroneous reference for Mali. A link to the corrected file is provided here. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 38% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,225,813
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#688
of 3,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,922
of 330,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#13
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.