You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dermoscopic variability of basal cell carcinoma according to clinical type and anatomic location
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1111/jdv.12980 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
M. Suppa, T. Micantonio, A. Di Stefani, H.P. Soyer, S. Chimenti, M.C. Fargnoli, K. Peris |
Abstract |
Correctly diagnosing basal cell carcinoma (BCC) clinical type is crucial for the therapeutic management. A systematic description of the variability of all reported BCC dermoscopic features according to clinical type and anatomic location is lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 18% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 62% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,784,639
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology
#2,392
of 5,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,595
of 361,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology & Venereology
#25
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.