| Title |
Extensive hybridization in hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) nesting in Brazil revealed by mtDNA analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-005-9102-9 |
| Authors |
P. Lara-Ruiz, G. G. Lopez, F. R. Santos, L. S. Soares |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 13 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 20% |
| Researcher | 39 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 35 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,828,810
of 23,520,142 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#868
of 1,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,579
of 72,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,520,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.